A “superior intelligence ship” has been visiting us since 1957

Members of the Aetherius society believe that beings with superior intelligence from planets such as Mars, Venus, Jupiter and Saturn have guided and protected humanity throughout our history.

The unique astronomical object called Oumuamua by scientists returns to headlines after respected astronomer Professor Avi Loeb speculated that it may have been a lost piece of “a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳ technology”.

At some points on its October 2017 journey through the Solar System, Oumuamua sped up in a way not expected for a mere chunk of space rock.

Now, a U̳F̳O̳ cult group has claimed that Oumuamua was not just an a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳ space probe, but that it is by no means the first such object to pass through our cosmic neighborhood.

The Aetherius Society is a pseudo-religious movement founded by Dr. George King in the mid-1950s as a result of what he claimed were contacts with a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳ intelligences he called the “Cosmic Masters” of humanity.

Society members believe that several other planets within our Solar System are inhabited, but not by life “as we know it”.

Society members claim that c̳i̳v̳i̳l̳i̳z̳a̳t̳i̳o̳n̳s̳ with some superior intelligence from Mars, Venus, Jupiter and Saturn have guided and protected humanity throughout our history.

They also claim that some of our greatest spiritual leaders, such as Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, Moses and others, actually came from other worlds.

In 1957, two exceptionally bright comets were visible from Earth.

According with the doctor. King, one of them was not a comet, but a spaceship under the control of an advanced spiritual intelligence from the planet Venus called \’Master Aetherius\’.

The spacecraft\’s function, King claimed, was to “weave a karmic web” that would cause some sort of spiritual awakening on Earth.

The 1957 observations were limited to the technology available at the time.

But a recent detailed study of Oumuamua suggests that reports of its e̳x̳t̳r̳a̳t̳e̳r̳r̳e̳s̳t̳r̳i̳a̳l̳ origin may have been a little premature.

Matthew Knight of the University of Maryland says: “The a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳ spacecraft hypothesis is a fun idea, but our analysis suggests that there are many natural phenomena that could explain it.”

But not everyone shares this theory. Wes Fraser, from Queen\’s University in Belfast, denies that it is a comet, mainly because the tail of dust and ice particles that often have these types of elements have not been appreciated.

He attributes its irregular movement to a possible impact with another object at some point in history.

Scientists at the Harvard Center for Astrophysics, in turn, defend the theory that it is an “artificial” element.

It is also among the options, they clarify, which could be the remains of “advanced technological equipment”.