‘ALIEN’ DNA Discovered in 400,000-Year-Old Human Bone Baffles Scientists!!

There is no convincing evidence of how humans appeared on Earth. Science has given some theories about human origin, but it doesn\’t please everyone. There are a number of experts who support the A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ astronaut theory which is widely acclaimed by people all over the world. In 2013 scientists discovered the oldest evidence of human DNA from a 400,000-year-old thigh bone. Instead of solving human history on Planet Earth, it deepened the mystery leaving scientists baffled.

The origins of our ancestors can be revealed by the discovery of 400,000-year-old human remains at the Sima de los Huesos (Spanish meaning “pit of bones”), a cave 43 feet below the surface of northern Spain. Although the bone is human it has “ALIEN DNA”. This surprising discovery has scientists re-evaluating everything they believe is true about human evolution.

The A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ bones for which genetic material was discovered in Spain have been attributed to Neanderthals, but Denisovans, an A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ human group other than Siberia, have a surprisingly similar genetic profile.

Since its discovery in the 1970s, the Poço dos Ossos and the bones it contains have been the subject of extensive research. The bones of 28 A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ people tentatively identified as Homo heidelbergensis dating back hundreds of thousands of years have been discovered so far. Due to their size and shape, the 400,000-year-old bones were initially assumed to belong to Neanderthals, an extinct species of A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ hominid that was on a different branch of the evolutionary tree of our ancestors.

O osso da coxa de um hominídeo de 400.000 anos de Sima de los Huesos, Espanha.Crédito…Javier Trueba, Madrid Scientific Films

The DNA that was extracted from these prehistoric bones suggests that there may have been many more A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ human species than previously believed. Another hypothesis is that these unidentified individuals discovered at Poço dos Ossos were common ancestors of Neanderthals and Denisovans. Mitochondrial DNA may have disappeared from Neanderthals at some point, but it persisted in Denisovans according to the study authors.

“Now we have to rethink the whole story,” said Juan Luis Arsuaga, a paleoanthropologist at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid and co-author of the paper. He doubted that Denisovans were spread across much of the Old World, from Spain to Siberia, disguised as Neanderthals.

Or skeleton of a hominid recovered from Sima de los Huesos. Credit…Javier Trueba, Madrid Scientific Films

Methods for recovering DNA fragments were invented by Svante Paabo of the Max Planck Institute and his colleagues, who published a stretch of DNA from a 40,000-year-old Neanderthal fossil in 1997. After their first success they and other researchers expanded by looking for DNA from other Neanderthals.

In 2006, a team of French and Belgian researchers obtained a 100,000-year-old Neanderthal DNA fragment that until the 2013 discovery held the record for the oldest human DNA ever found. The earlier revelation helped provide insights into how Neanderthals and humans diverged hundreds of thousands of years ago from a common ancestor. Furthermore, it demonstrated that around 50,000 years ago, humans and Neanderthals interbred.

Further research has revealed that 1% of the Denisovan genome originated from a different and mysterious relative that experts have called a “super-archaic human”. According to estimates some modern humans may possess 15% of these “super-archaic” genetic regions. This study establishes a close relationship between the Sima de los Huesos people and Neanderthals, Denisovans and an unidentified population of early humans. So who would this unidentified ancestor of humans be?

Homo erectus, an extinct ancestor of modern humans who lived in Africa about a million years ago, may be an unidentified ancestor. The thing is, we\’ve never discovered any H. erectus DNA so at this point the best we can do is speculate.

In 2018 scientists published their findings on “dark matter” DNA which are long, winding strands of DNA with no obvious functions but are identical in all vertebrates from humans, mice to chickens. Before, scientists used to think that less than 2% of our DNA actually codes for humans and the remaining 98.5% of DNA sequences is so-called “junk DNA” that is useless.

Although science is still evolving and trying to understand the purpose of our DNA, some studies seem to show that intracellular environmental and energetic influences can alter DNA. In biology, epigenetics is the study of heritable phenotype changes that do not involve changes in DNA sequence.

Alternative explanation
However, some theorists have advanced some extremely intriguing ideas. The so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA according to this argument are nothing less than the genetic code for e̳x̳t̳r̳a̳t̳e̳r̳r̳e̳s̳t̳r̳i̳a̳l̳ life forms. According to them some form of highly developed e̳x̳t̳r̳a̳t̳e̳r̳r̳e̳s̳t̳r̳i̳a̳l̳ race deliberately altered human DNA in the distant past and the unidentified “super-archaic” ancestor of the Sima de los Huesos people may serve as proof of this induced development.

There are numerous A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ carvings that resemble the DNA double helix motif which has led theorists to speculate that our DNA was modified in the distant past. An interesting idea is the concept of the “third eye” that A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ cultures knew about. The speculative invisible eye usually described as located in the pituitary gland of the brain is believed to provide perception beyond ordinary vision. The pinecone-shaped gland symbols appear linked to strange beings who seem to be carrying out some alteration of the “Tree of Life”. To some the tree seems to symbolize human DNA and vertebrae.

The tree of knowledge, connecting heaven and the underworld, and the tree of life, connecting all forms of creation are both forms of the world tree or cosmic tree[2] and are portrayed in various religions and philosophies as the same tree.
In A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ Mesopotamia, the Assyrian tree of life was represented by a series of intersecting knots and lines. There are no definitive answers for this symbol. But according to A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ literature for example in the Epic of Gilgamesh there is a quest for immortality. Also King Etana seeks a “birth plant” to give him a son. This one has a solid provenance of antiquity being found on cylinder seals from Akkad.

Do all these points suggest the presence of advanced knowledge used by A̳n̳c̳i̳e̳n̳t̳ beings to alter the structure of DNA? It seems absurd however scientists today seem to be reaching similar conclusions. It cannot be denied that very little is known about the vast majority of DNA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *