The Moon is a “Noah’s Ark” from space and someone abandoned it a long time ago

NASA categorically rejects the idea that our moon is not solid, but programs funded by the space agency continue to show interest in its interior.
The routine discovery of hundreds of lunar surface skylights (holes in the Moon through which the cavernous tunnels beneath it can be seen) recently led NASA to sponsor the development of robotic mini-rovers designed to take images and study alien cracks.

The authors of a study published in the October 2020 issue of Geoscience Reviews calculated the size of these giant lunar voids. It turns out that many of these underground cavities are hundreds of times larger than anything visible on Earth. One of the giant lunar tunnels “could easily fit a small city within its walls,” according to the study leaders.

Taken together, these events have reignited speculation about the moon’s true composition and interior.

The idea that Earth’s nearest neighbor in space might be empty has gained quite a following over the years.

The modern “hollow moon theory” can be traced back in part to a 1966 book by renowned astronomer Carl Sagan and Russian astrophysicist IS Shklovsky. His book “Intelligent Life in the Universe” includes a chapter on the curious nature of the moons orbiting Mars.

According to their calculations, the density of these objects was unusually low, leading them to wonder: Are they “hard on the outside and hollow on the inside”?

The authors wondered if an advanced Martian civilization might have created satellites to serve as low-gravity platforms. This orbital arrangement will allow them to launch missions into deep space more easily, an advantage that Earth’s moon also offers.

Dr. Wernher von Braun, the grandfather of NASA’s rocket program, wrote an article for Popular Mechanics about the Apollo 13 mission plan to crash the segment of the 15-ton rocket, the Saturn V, into the surface of the Earth. moon, inadvertently powering “The Hollow Moon”. “saga.

The experiment was a follow-up to the deliberate crash of the Apollo 12 lunar module, which caused the Moon to “ring like a bell for nearly an hour, indicating a strange and mysterious underground structure.”

Although Apollo 13 failed to land on the moon, they were able to deliver a payload for the experiment, and the result was similar to impacts from previous impacts on the moon.

Mission Control told the Apollo 13 crew of their success: “It looks like your booster just hit the moon, which shook it up a bit.” Hollow Theorist provided the material.

Based on Sagan’s early reflections on the nature of the Martian moons, two Russian scientists, Vasin and Shcherbakov, proposed that the moon’s features can be resolved with a logical explanation: the moon is an artificial hollow body, a satellite was placed particularly close to Mars. A highly developed extraterrestrial civilization on our planet. If you’re reading this, this content has been stolen from anomalien.com and whoever copied the text didn’t realize it. But our lawyers will.

The Soviet duo published their take on the matter in a 1970 article titled “Is the Moon the Creation of Extraterrestrial Intelligence?” His indirect hypothesis about alien-made satellites paved the way for what became known as the “Lunar Spacecraft Hypothesis.”

One of the first to adopt this hypothesis was the researcher and author Don Wilson. He described his hypothesis about artificial satellites orbiting the Earth in two books: “Our Mysterious Lunar Spacecraft” (1975) and “The Secret of Our Lunar Spacecraft” (1979).

Wilson cites anomalies such as shallow craters on the moon (the solid hull that protects lunar spacecraft from deep penetration by meteors) and the presence of strange structures and lights on the surface (evidence of man-made vehicles and markers). navigation) as evidence that the moon did not form naturally.

Inspired by Vassin and Shcherbakov’s “Soviet spaceship theory”, Wilson agrees that the moon is an ancient alien spacecraft. This requires it to be essentially a hollow vehicle, especially given the size of the expected payload: “The huge spaceship carries everything needed, like Noah’s ark, for sentient beings to travel the universe.”

Interestingly, Wilson mentions the existence of a lunar feature that resembles a skylight. He referred to the work of amateur astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkins, who believed that “in the interior of the Moon there are in fact vast hollow regions, possibly in the form of cavities, connected to the surface by gigantic holes or shafts.”

These “craters” could be entrances to “hidden underground bases located inside the moon,” Wilson said.

Another book, in the same style as Wilson, co-authored by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler. In Who Built the Moon? The authors (2005) point to many “unrealistic coincidences” between the Moon, Sun, and Earth (for example, the exact size of the Moon needed for a solar eclipse, or Earth’s tidal regulation) and insist that the satellite of the Moon of our planet creates goals.

Contrary to Wilson’s conclusion that the Moon was a “cosmic Noah’s Ark” brought to its present location from the outer solar system, Butler and Knight argue that it was built by Earth-based architects using items available on Earth.

That’s why tests of materials on the moon’s surface have shown its composition to be remarkably similar to Earth’s, it is claimed.

As for who has plans for an artificial moon, Knight explained three possibilities in an interview with New Dawn:

“God, aliens or humans. The only thing that is 100% scientifically feasible is the latter. It is generally accepted that time travel is physically possible, and some scientists are on the verge of sending matter back in time. We can speculate that the future it can create machines that could be sent back to extract material from the young Earth to build the moon, perhaps using miniature black hole technology.”

Some of the mysteries surrounding the moon may finally be solved by investing in robust, autonomous robots. New rovers are being developed specifically for subsurface exploration of the moon’s dark crevices. Today’s prototype can be propelled through an open alien mouth and is equipped with high-resolution imaging equipment.

One of the advanced models has been tested in a crater in Utah in preparation for a future study of the moon. The unmanned lunar lander, called the PitRanger by its creators at Carnegie Mellon University, is designed to collect photos of the funnel from various angles and get a complete picture of the situation on Earth.

Gaining a more detailed understanding of these underground portals could greatly expand our understanding of how the Moon works. With any luck, some of these rovers could be deployed as early as 2022 and should be seriously considered as part of NASA’s Artemis lunar missions.

It may not be an ancient hollow alien spacecraft, but the origin of the moon is still unclear from a scientific point of view. It makes sense that a concerted effort is being made to send rovers to explore underground tunnels on the Moon, not only for their base-building value, but also for the trove of data they likely hold about how bodies formed on the Moon.

If soon-to-be-explored lunar tunnels extend far below the surface, they could help explain some oft-cited Moon anomalies and provide access to secrets buried beneath the regolith.

As evidenced by the growing interest in robots capable of penetrating sublunar cavities and lunar exploration, even if hollow moon theories don’t excite NASA officials, they do generate interest.